skip to main |
skip to sidebar
The Kyoto protocol signed in 1997 required 37 counties to cut there carbon emissions. A loophole in this agreement did not count carbon from bio energy. Countries seeking to boost their bioenergy production deforested their land to plant crops for biofuel. Several scientists point out that this does not help reduce the carbon in the atmosphere. By deforesting, you cut down forests that intake carbon and replace biofuel that intake and outtake carbon. The scientists hope to prove their point and cause world leaders to amend the Kyoto protocol when a climate treaty is signed in Copenhagen summit in December.
My opinion on this article is that it was informative and interesting. I found a lot of new information, and it makes me think again about the "benefits" of biofuel. This article captivated my attention because I had always thought of biofuel to be the answer to the environmental issues, but now, I have the knowledge of the consequences of burning biofuel. Overall, I learned many new things and I enjoyed reading about this topic.
2 comments:
I definitely agree that world leaders should amend the Kyoto protocol, because this "bio fuel loophole" is definitely a huge one and contributes greatly to a country's carbon emissions.
That is really cheap that they can do that and still hurt the environment that is just wasteful and if you cut trees to make alternative energy its faults outweigh its helpfulness.
Post a Comment